What Are Core Web Vitals?
Core Web Vitals are a subset of Google's Web Vitals initiative, which is a broader effort to provide unified guidance for quality signals that are essential to delivering a great user experience on the web. Introduced in May 2020 and incorporated into Google's ranking algorithm in June 2021 as part of the Page Experience update, Core Web Vitals represent the metrics Google considers most important for evaluating how users actually experience a web page. They focus on three dimensions of user experience: loading speed, interactivity, and visual stability.
Unlike traditional performance metrics that measure server response times or total page weight, Core Web Vitals are user-centric. They are measured from the perspective of a real person visiting your page, capturing what that person sees and feels during the loading process. A page might load all its resources in two seconds according to server logs, but if the largest visible element does not appear for four seconds, the user perceives the page as slow. Core Web Vitals bridge the gap between technical performance data and actual user perception.
For small business owners, Core Web Vitals matter because they are one of the few performance metrics that Google has publicly confirmed as a ranking signal. This means that two pages with identical content and backlink profiles could rank differently based on their Core Web Vitals scores. While content relevance remains the dominant ranking factor, Core Web Vitals serve as a tiebreaker that can push your page ahead of competitors or drag it behind. With Google continuing to refine and expand its page experience signals, investing in Core Web Vitals now positions your site well for future algorithm changes.
The Three Core Web Vitals Metrics
The first Core Web Vital is Largest Contentful Paint, or LCP, which measures loading performance. Specifically, LCP tracks the time it takes for the largest visible element in the viewport to finish rendering. This element is usually a hero image, a large text block, or a video poster frame. Google considers an LCP of 2.5 seconds or less as good, between 2.5 and 4 seconds as needing improvement, and anything above 4 seconds as poor. For most small business websites, the hero image on the homepage is the LCP element, so optimizing that single image can dramatically improve your score.
The second metric is Interaction to Next Paint, or INP, which replaced First Input Delay in March 2024 as the interactivity metric. INP measures the latency of all interactions a user makes with a page throughout its entire lifecycle, then reports the worst interaction minus outliers. An interaction includes clicks, taps, and key presses. Google considers an INP of 200 milliseconds or less as good, between 200 and 500 milliseconds as needing improvement, and above 500 milliseconds as poor. High INP scores typically result from heavy JavaScript execution that blocks the main thread, preventing the browser from responding to user input promptly.
The third metric is Cumulative Layout Shift, or CLS, which measures visual stability. CLS quantifies how much the visible content of a page shifts unexpectedly during the loading process. You have probably experienced this yourself: you start reading an article, and suddenly the text jumps down because an advertisement loaded above it, or you try to tap a button and it moves just as your finger lands. Google considers a CLS score of 0.1 or less as good, between 0.1 and 0.25 as needing improvement, and above 0.25 as poor. CLS is calculated by multiplying the fraction of the viewport that shifted by the distance the content moved.
Check your core web vitals for free
Lumio SEO scans your website in 60 seconds and checks your core web vitals along with 40+ other SEO factors.
Analyze My Site FreeNo signup required. Results in 60 seconds.
Why Core Web Vitals Matter for SEO
Google began using Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal in June 2021, making them one of the most concrete, measurable factors in the search algorithm. While Google has always valued fast, user-friendly websites, Core Web Vitals gave site owners specific, quantifiable thresholds to target. This is unusual for Google, which typically keeps its ranking factors vague. The clarity of Core Web Vitals means you can measure exactly where you stand, know precisely what "good" looks like, and track your progress as you make improvements.
The impact of Core Web Vitals on rankings is most significant in competitive niches where multiple pages offer similar content quality and authority. If you and a competitor both have strong content about the same topic but your site passes all three Core Web Vitals while theirs fails, you gain an edge. For small businesses competing against other local businesses, this edge can mean the difference between appearing on page one and being buried on page two. Google has also indicated that page experience signals, which include Core Web Vitals, may be used to determine which results appear in special search features like Top Stories and other prominent SERP placements.
Beyond rankings, Core Web Vitals directly affect user behavior on your site. Research from Google shows that when a site meets the Core Web Vitals thresholds, users are 24 percent less likely to abandon page loads. For e-commerce sites, improvements in LCP and CLS correlate with higher conversion rates and lower bounce rates. A study by Vodafone found that a 31 percent improvement in LCP led to an 8 percent increase in sales. For small business owners, this means that fixing Core Web Vitals does not just improve your search rankings but also improves the actual experience of customers visiting your site, leading to more inquiries, sales, and repeat visits.
How to Measure Core Web Vitals
There are two types of Core Web Vitals data: field data and lab data. Field data, also called real-user monitoring or RUM data, comes from actual visitors to your site. Google collects this through the Chrome User Experience Report, which aggregates anonymized performance data from Chrome users who have opted in to sharing usage statistics. Field data reflects the true experience of your users across different devices, networks, and geographic locations. It is the data Google uses for ranking purposes, making it the gold standard for Core Web Vitals assessment.
Lab data comes from controlled testing environments like Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, and Chrome DevTools. When you run a Lighthouse audit, it simulates a page load on a mid-tier mobile device with a throttled network connection and reports the Core Web Vitals scores. Lab data is valuable for debugging because it is reproducible and you can test changes before deploying them to production. However, lab data does not capture the full range of real-world conditions your users encounter, so it may not perfectly match your field data. A page might score well in lab testing but poorly in the field if your real users are on slower devices or networks.
For small business owners, the most accessible tool for checking Core Web Vitals is Google PageSpeed Insights. Simply enter your URL and the tool provides both field data (if available) and lab data along with specific recommendations for improvement. Google Search Console also includes a Core Web Vitals report that shows the status of all pages on your site, grouped by status (good, needs improvement, or poor) for both mobile and desktop. This report is particularly useful for identifying site-wide patterns, such as a common template issue causing poor CLS across all blog posts. Lumio SEO integrates these checks directly into its analysis workflow, giving you Core Web Vitals data alongside your other SEO metrics in a single dashboard.
Improving Your Core Web Vitals Scores
Improving LCP often starts with optimizing your images. The largest element in the viewport is frequently an image, and if that image is uncompressed, served in an outdated format like PNG or JPEG instead of WebP or AVIF, or loaded lazily when it should be loaded eagerly, your LCP will suffer. Convert your hero images to modern formats, compress them appropriately, and ensure the LCP image is not lazy-loaded. Additionally, ensure your server responds quickly by using a content delivery network and enabling proper caching headers. Reducing the size of your CSS and JavaScript bundles also helps because the browser must download and parse these resources before it can render content.
For INP, the primary culprit is almost always JavaScript. Heavy JavaScript frameworks, third-party scripts like chat widgets and analytics tags, and complex event handlers can all block the browser's main thread, delaying the response to user interactions. Start by auditing your third-party scripts and removing any that are not essential. For the scripts you keep, consider loading them asynchronously or deferring their execution until after the page is interactive. Code splitting, which breaks your JavaScript into smaller chunks that load on demand, is another effective technique. If you use a popular CMS like WordPress, deactivate plugins you are not using and test the impact of each active plugin on your INP score.
CLS improvements focus on reserving space for elements that load dynamically. The most common causes of layout shift are images and videos without explicit width and height attributes, advertisements that inject themselves into the page after load, web fonts that cause text to reflow when they replace fallback fonts, and dynamically injected content above existing content. Always set width and height attributes on images and video elements so the browser can allocate the correct space before the media loads. For web fonts, use the font-display swap property with a fallback font that has similar dimensions. For advertisements, reserve a fixed-size container in your layout. These changes are usually straightforward to implement and produce immediate CLS improvements.
How Lumio SEO Monitors Core Web Vitals
Lumio SEO includes Core Web Vitals analysis as a core part of its page audit workflow. When you submit a URL for analysis, the tool measures LCP, INP-related interactivity signals, and CLS using the same methodology that Google employs. The results are presented in a clear, visual format that shows whether each metric passes, needs improvement, or fails, with exact numeric scores and the thresholds for each rating. You do not need to understand the technical details behind each metric because the report translates scores into plain-language assessments.
Beyond the raw scores, Lumio SEO identifies the specific elements and resources responsible for poor performance. If your LCP is slow, the report pinpoints which element is the largest contentful paint and what is delaying its render, whether that is a large unoptimized image, slow server response, or render-blocking CSS. If your CLS is high, the tool identifies which elements shifted and by how much, giving you a clear target for fixes. This element-level diagnosis saves hours of manual debugging and helps small business owners communicate specific fixes to their web developer or agency.
The tool also tracks Core Web Vitals over time when you run repeat audits, allowing you to see whether your optimization efforts are producing results. This longitudinal view is essential because Core Web Vitals can fluctuate due to changes in your content, new third-party scripts, or hosting performance variations. Lumio SEO flags regressions immediately, alerting you if a previously passing metric starts to fail. Combined with the other 74-plus checks Lumio SEO performs, the Core Web Vitals analysis gives you a complete picture of your page's health and a prioritized list of the most impactful improvements you can make.